Total TV Online.com-The Show
Description: more
Hosted by: Darcy Fournier
Phone Number: (724) 444-7444
Call ID: 33874

Last Recording
Title: General Hospital Actor is Guest

Who Follows
  Sign In to follow

Add To Your Blog
Widgets & Badges

Share
Email a Friend
Facebook

Reviews
  Sign In to review

Nothing Scheduled

Past Episodes (10)

Time: Duration: Title: Recordings:
10/02/2007 09:00 PM EDT
1:02:43
General Hospital Actor is Guest
   
09/11/2007 09:00 PM EDT
57:28
With Guest Bryan Dattilo
   
07/24/2007 09:00 PM EDT
1:00:46
EPISODE8 - Total TV Online
   
07/17/2007 09:00 PM EDT
1:09:06
EPISODE7 - Total TV Online
   
07/10/2007 09:00 PM EDT
1:03:39
Total TV Online.com The Show #5
   
07/03/2007 09:00 PM EDT
1:15:28
TTO THE SHOW 7/3/2007
   
06/26/2007 09:00 PM EDT
59:44
TTO The Show #2
   
06/19/2007 09:00 PM EDT
1:15:27
Total TV Online
   
06/16/2007 09:00 PM EDT
54:43
Post Daytime Emmy Coverage
   
06/14/2007 09:00 PM EDT
54:45
Daytime Emmy Coverage
   

Reviews


Such Hypocrisy - Reviewer: antigone01 01/09/09 12:26 AM EST
Full Comment: I find some of the podcast comments extremely hypocritical. For one, if you are so concerned about women viewers and the impressionable minds of young girls - WHY do you encourage a woman (Sami) to be in a relationship with a man (Lucas) who emotionally abuses her constantly, degrades her, and has tried to KILL her twice, not to mention a host of other crimes and acts against her. Where is the campaign against domestic violence and murder? How about the fact that Jeremy treats the young girl, Stephanie, like garbage. Where is the tirade against sexism? And so on and so forth. There is no such campaigns against the other characters and storylines and issues. Why? As far as Sami goes, I know Sami is no saint herself, what with her actually committing rape herself, among other things. But there can be no debate or discussion if one side (the Lumi side and this podcasts' view) tries to ignore some of the key facts, as well as ignoring other rape storylines on Days of Our Lives. I find it ludicrous that Lumi fans seem to only care about supposed "rape" of one character and in one storyline. However, if it didn't involve someone coming between Sami and Lucas, I highly doubt we would even be having a discussion about daytime rape or a RINR campaign. I think this campaign is a slap in the face to any and all real rape victims! Further, no one is saying that EJ didn't do anything wrong. He has done wrong. But there is NO black and white here. There are shades of grey and that is exactly where all 3 of these characters remain (Sami, EJ, and Lucas). Sami is the one who started the indecent proposal to begin with, she said she would do anything. She AGREED to have sex with EJ. He did not physically hurt her in any way. In fact, the man practically worships the ground she walks on. He treats her better than any other character has ever treated Sami. Not just saving her life, but supporting her, and believing in her and accepting who she is - both the bad and the good. As far as I am concerned, none of these characters have actually been "redeemed" - they just are who they are. As I said, they are in the grey area - neither hero or villain, as they have all done terrible things as well as good things. The only thing is, EJ is the only one getting blamed for anything or called on his actions. What happened between EJ and Sami was not rape. For it to be rape there would have to be no consent. Sami immediately consented, and there was no physical harm to her in any way, so therefore if anyone wants to supposedly talk about 'realism' here - any court in America would not charge EJ with rape, if it were real life. By the way - Lumi fans like to conveniently mention the gun EJ had. However, let's be honest, the gun was nowhere near Sami or in sight at all when EJ mentioned the sex bargain. Plus, Sami is not afraid of EJ at all. She really never has been.

this is an interview??? - Reviewer: kelly33 09/16/07 04:28 PM EDT
Full Comment: what i found is that for the most part you were talking over your guest and putting words in his mouth. anytime you interview a daytime star like bryan datillo the last thing you should say is you watch GH more than you watch the show he stars on, i found that very unprofessional and downright tacky...anytime i tune in to hear a podcast i want to hear more the the guest talking not the person conducting the interview interrupting that person and drawing their own conclusions about what the guest had to say, honestly i would be so embarrased if i were you.

What was your problem? - Reviewer: Kellyana 09/12/07 07:21 PM EDT
Full Comment: Congrats to Bryan for being a great guy. If I was rating just him he'd get a 5 but your total domination, put down of an entire fan base that Bryan tried to say was cool (I guess he liked our gift to him), your redirection of EVERYTHING he said, your interuption of his answers, and your incorrect information (who that Lucas has been involved with has died??) was just wrong. Bryan gets props, you get the doggies pooper scooper because you had no clue. To reitterate, I was impressed with Bryan, it was Darcy who blew this interview. Must have been the soap Gods blocking the phones last night. Good for them, it shut you, Darcy, up!!

Great Show! - Reviewer: Kari936 09/12/07 02:25 AM EDT
Full Comment: I just got a chance to listen to your interview with Bryan Datillo. I wasn't able to do so that night and I love the fact that you make your broadcasts available for download!! The interview was awesome and I'm impressed that you were able to get BD to call in and chat! What a great guy and very funny. Bryan that is, as you, Darcy, are a god!!!! Kepp up the great work!

Srry From potro5 - Reviewer: parkerlreed 07/10/07 10:05 PM EDT
Full Comment: srry about the chat thing

A great Idea! - Reviewer: falicee53 07/07/07 05:14 PM EDT
Full Comment: I think this is a cool idea and I am glad to be able to listen at my leisure. It was interesting to hear other peoples input, since I dont know anyone who currantly watches soaps. I personally have little to no interest in shows not on ABC so that part was a bummer. But I also have to say that the show has improved since the first show. People are getting more comfortable with the idea. Perhaps this is a step to take to get rid of that useless POS Bob Guza, if we pull together and start a ground swell.

A little truth and reasonability would be good 4 ALL - Reviewer: truthbknown 07/04/07 03:49 AM EDT
Full Comment: Not one of us is our fan base and it would do everyone good to remember that and treat people like human beings. Don't get taken in Darcy.

good show - Reviewer: daniellevans 07/04/07 01:12 AM EDT
Full Comment: I agree - Parish Hilton sucks, Isaish Washington sucks, and American Idol sucks. lol And you had a fairly intertaining show. There is one thing I feel that I should clarify though. Since the defense of EJ wasn't really allowed, I have to mention some things that were not taken into consideration. For one, you say that EJ's "redemption" is being lightswitched and that basically he is all of a sudden being made to be a different guy. I firmly disagree. EJ is a complex character with a great deal of layers and depth. That is the main thing that makes him interesting. I believe that the EJ that first came into Salem is similar to the EJ we are seeing now. I believe that is mostly the real EJ. Of course he has done wrong, but there are reasons for that. Very good reasons I might add. However, he has a lot of good in him. He would have been a better person all along had Stefano not raised him, trained him, and manipulated him. He loves his father very much and is extremely loyal to his family. He did NOT want to do many of the things he has had to do, but he was forced to. Like for instance, in the warehouse - one of the many times he has saved Samantha's life and her unborn child(ren)- He said he didn't want to do that (bring her there) just like he hasn't wanted to do so many things. Stefano (and Tony) has forced him to commit crimes. Also, some of the things we thought he did has been shown to not be the case. Just for instance - he never harmed Lexi. That was Tony's doing. EJ has been put into an impossible situation. He has always cared about Samantha (and she had feelings for him from the very beginning as well). He has accepted her for all she is, has protected her, defied his family and everything he has ever known, etc. The list goes on and on. Now this is important, because Sami KNOWS he loves her (and he loved her unconditionally I might add) and she is not afraid of him. Not a bit. I think you and some people are seeing this in too much of black and white terms. There is no simply black and white with any of this storyline or characters. That is important to keep in mind. Nothing's just cut and dry. Also? Those scenarios you gave of someone's daughter being in Sami's position. Well, again, you didn't take anything else into consideration. For one, Sami knew that EJ cared about her. I mean she had just set him up and the reason it worked was because she played on EJ's feelings for her. So first of all, he wasn't just some random or psycho guy on the side of the road. They had had a friendship and relationship before and she knew him very well and knew very well that he had feelings for her. Secondly, after they had sex in the car or however you view what happened - she not only slapped EJ, but when he told her never to hit him again, she grabbed his finger and angrily defied him. That is NOT the behavior of someone who was supposedly just raped at gun point, so you say. The gun played no part whatsoever. If it did, she would not have defied him so much after the sex - because if she was so scared, what would make her think that he wouldn't just shoot her after they had sex? That was not the case at all. She knew better, she was not scared of EJ or that gun. You fail to take everything into consideration in your evaluation of what happened and the EJ and Sami characters in general.

Great podcast - Reviewer: cindy77 07/03/07 10:20 PM EDT
Full Comment: I am a Lumi fan but I thought it was great that both sides have now been able to talk about their feelings regarding the show and the direction its taken in recent months. I also liked your segment on racism on soaps. I don't watch ABC soaps but I still found it interesting to listen to.

your podcast - Reviewer: simisweet 07/03/07 10:12 PM EDT
Full Comment: Ok, so I came in admittedly as a fan of the Ejami s/l. I am pleased that you allowed an opposing viewpoint. I found the podcast as a whole entertaining, and the topics timely. I think the way the storyline was written was irresponsible, but not unredeemable. I do not agree with everything said, but, hey, I'm allowed. I do wish the sniping fan wars would stop. Tonight was another banner example of chat baiting and unecessary crapola when the topic was done. I say agree to disagree, and be done. Obviously we are all still watching....it's a soap opera, not nuclear proliferation.

Not impressed - Reviewer: larryfriend 07/03/07 08:39 PM EDT
Full Comment: I just don't like or appreciate the lack of respect and condescension Darcy clearly has for his listeners.

Thank you/last week and tonights comments - Reviewer: Avalonia 07/03/07 08:35 PM EDT
Full Comment: I'm a brand new listener...never even knew something like this existed. I enjoyed listening to last week's show very much and thought you were fair. Looking forward to tonight's show. Oh, and MrsBennett...I have never heard any Lumi use the term rapemi to describe anyone other than the couple itself, EJ and Sami. It's a combo of their names (derogatory nickname for EJ.) I would not support calling any fan that- I don't use it myself and I'm sorry you don't like it, but Ejami fans also have their own mocking nicknames for Lucas. Also, I am shocked at the assumption that people who participate in the RINR campaign haven't had real experiences with rape. It seems very clear that our many writings on the subject have been completely ignored. Many supporters have come forward with their own stories, and I have as well. There is a reason why this is such a serious issue to us. Tonight's podcast: I guess I'm not allowed to rate/comment on tonight's separately so I'm modifying this post. Tonight's show was great and definitely made me a fan of this podcast. I think the Ejami reps were very respectful but I have to say there was nothing said that made me alter my opinion in the least. I don't think Sami was culpable in her own rape and there seemed to be a lot of fingerpointing at her. I absolutely agree that the fanbase war insulting and sniping is ridiculous. I don't care who likes Ejami-it's not wrong to like them, this is a show. The RINR is aimed at the producers, because some of us feel it is completely irresponsible to have a storyline like this and treat rape and coercion like a prelude to a relationship. It's a disservice to the viewers, in my opinion. I would like to correct the assumption that the campaign is all about getting LUMI together. It is not. Those who choose to continue to believe so, go ahead but to me, it is very important that what happened to Sami not be portrayed in the callous way that it has been.

miss quoted - Reviewer: Jeanetta 07/03/07 06:41 PM EDT
Full Comment: You miss quoted what I said in the chat. What I said was â??Sami could have gotten out of the car. She wanted EJâ??s help.â?? I never used the word â??EJâ??s kinda helpâ?? What that meant was Sami could have gotten out of the car but she needed EJâ??s help to save Lucas. Sami did have a choice and she chooses to make the deal with EJ. Sami could have gotten out of the car and walked back to the road block. She had the time to do just that. Just look at the timeline to have sex (undress, get in th back seat, have sex, get back in the front seat, and then get redressed), drive back to some where to park the car before the road block (remember EJ needed Sami to get through the road block in the first place. Sami didnâ??t leave with EJ again after he saved Lucas), walk through the woods back to the cabin. She had enough time to get back to that road block or find other help for Lucas. It was clear Sami was never scared of the gun EJ had and EJ put the gun down more then once. When they had sex in the car and then at the cabin he laid it on the table; Sami never once went for the gun. She did slap him in the car and she tried to slap him in the cabin. I was hoping to hear more about women in TV who have raped the men they loved Theresa/Ethan, Sami/Austin, and Kay/Mequal. Iâ??m sure there are other women from other shows that have raped the men in their life and went on to be in a relationship with or married to them. I would love to see why there is this double standard when it comes to a woman who never show remorse or owns up to what they did with raping these men. No one ever gets mad when their storyline is rewritten, no one calls them out on their actions, or no one calls for these men to go get tested and the woman to pay for their crime of clear cut rape. Yet itâ??s wrong to redeem a male character for the same crimes or itâ??s wrong to rewrite something and insensitive to real rape victims. All the while making excuses/justifying what these women did with; well she was only 15 or she had to do it to be able to her child back. A lot of the men who in history of TV do show remorse for hurting the women they hurt wither by rape or having sex with a woman because she needs his help at the time so he uses that to get what he wants. These men can bend over backwards saying sorry and protecting them at all cost, but they will always be wrong for what they did, yet the women get off scot-free with no sorry, remorse, or anyone calling them on their actions. As far as the rest of the show about ABC I canâ??t really comment on it, because I only watch two shows on ABC and those are Greyâ??s Anatomy and Ugly Betty. Both of the shows seem balanced to me on everything you were talking about. I did find it interesting that other shows on this station arenâ??t so balanced.

Please stop saying Rapemi - Reviewer: mrsbennett 07/02/07 07:38 PM EDT
Full Comment: I am both a Lumi and an EJami fan, because I support Samantha. However lately hearing all of the EJami fans being dubbed "Rapemi's" instead of EJami's is extremely offensive to me as a survivor of a rape attack. Neither I nor any other fan I know has the desire to be raped! Most of us do not believe it was actual rape, therefore we could not possibly support rape. I truly hope the commentator of this podcast does not support such language and blatant insults to EJami fans. I was told it was one of his last guest commentators of this podcast, SuperSami, who started this whole Rapemi name calling. Can you not see it hurts those of us who have actually been raped? I do not support the RINR campaign either, because I believe it severely marginalizes and trivializes real rape like I and some of my fellow fans have experienced. It hurts real victims, but none more so than calling us Rapemi's! Please have class, ladies, and do not call us Rapemi's. Consider who you just may be hurting. Or are you so caught up in your own selfishness that you just don't care? I truly hope that is not the case. Because I for one would no longer have any desire to be associated with a fanbase (Lumi) that makes fun of and humiliates real rape victims. Please don't tear any of the fanbases up by using this language.

there was never any legitimate offer to begin with - Reviewer: seraphim 07/02/07 07:02 PM EDT
Full Comment: You should be ashamed of yourself Darcy. Coming into a website private chatroom and harassing ladies who did nothing to you, most of whom didn't even know who you were! Cursing ladies and calling them names is beyond unprofessional. There is definite proof floating around of what you did in that chatroom. You couldn't deny it. Then you go rescinding your supposed "offer". It's fairly obvious you never meant for both sides to have equal time to begin with. You only wanted a supposed "reason" to cancel. And you only wanted more viewers, by lieing and saying that you were going to give equal time - you just tried to lure people into your next podcast under false pretenses. Furthermore it is not your business to be a controlling jerk and tell your listeners how they can and can not rate, let alone everything else you did. You should be ashamed of yourself. Are you a middle-aged man or an infant?!??

Great Pod again, huge new fan! - Reviewer: salumifan 07/02/07 05:10 PM EDT
Full Comment: I just wanted to say this is the second time Ive tuned in.I LOVED last weeks and I must say I realy liked what you had to say this week to!You have a new fan all the way in South Africa!!

I rated after listening - Reviewer: davidsmommy 07/02/07 04:53 PM EDT
Full Comment: I read all the comments, and kind of felt compelled to give it a 4 not for what I really felt about the whole, show, but by what the commentator came on an blasted the EJami fan base for, and for the record, I am not a fan base member, I just enjoy the show, but do have a friend who is a very big fan of James Scott from All My Children. She is convinced the same fan base that persecuted him on that show has now taken up the same cause with James on Days. The most interesting part of the show was the first part, and I can understand why the comments came as they did. You would expect the Lumi base to think it was great, but the way the other view was not presented or was semi bashed made it understandable why the ratings came as they did. It was noted by many of them who did comment how they looked forward to being able to hear the other side of the argument and how nice it was of Darcy to make the offer. So the saddest thing is that the other side is not going to be heard since the commentator got angry and has now rescinded the offer I heard through the grapevine. Which means the show will probably again be the same one sided viewpoint as before. Just so those of you know, the person who went into the chat and had a fit was none other than the commentator. From what I heard, he was rude, cussed at the people in the chat, and then rescinded the offer of equal time. This means he will not be heard by many people who would have tuned in to hear the opposition viewpoint. That is our loss, and his, as it seems these podcasts get paid by the download count or listener count.

I'm loving your show. - Reviewer: krazyC 07/01/07 08:32 PM EDT
Full Comment: I think you are doing a great job and I applaud you for taking on such expolsive subject of rape. Sami's rape wasn't the only rape Days has dropped the ball on. The rape of Jan Spears was handled poorly and turned in a plot driven storyline that turned her into a bigger villain and cartoonish to boot. Anyway Kudos to you and I think your Cool. Keep up your great work.

Great show - Reviewer: Sep987 07/01/07 03:47 PM EDT
Full Comment: Edited: Just listened to the most recent show and enjoyed it. Darcy, thanks for provoking food for thought on the issues of racism and gender prejudice. I don't watch ABC soaps so I can't comment on them, but it was good brain-chow. I also appreciate you providing an opportunity for rebuttal in regards to the RINR campaign. Your guests were articulate and respectful, but I was a bit disappointed that your questions were not answered directly. I had been looking forward to hearing a fair rebuttal about the RINR campaign, but instead heard mostly reasons why ejami should be together or why ej should be redeemed, or why it was Sami's fault. Oh well, thanks for trying anyway, Darcy. The show overall was well done - I like your style. :) First review: I've never listened to your show before, but will in future! Your segment about rape on soaps, specifically the current Days storyline, was presented respectfully and done very well. Entertaining and thought-provoking, no matter what viewpoint the listener has. Thank you! I'm looking forward to hear the next show with the 'opposing' viewpoints as well.

Telecast from June 26 - Reviewer: hfce 07/01/07 02:18 PM EDT
Full Comment: I just listened to your telecast and it was great. I so agree with the rape not being romance. There is nothing entertaining about seeing a rapist and his victim fall in love. As far as I am concerned once someone rapes you that should be the end. Daytime is just not a place that could handle a subject like Rape. They trivialize to many topics for them to do it justice. I gave you a 5 rating. You so deserve it. I had such a great time that I will be back next week to listen in on the show.

***** - Reviewer: skultrack 07/01/07 01:06 PM EDT
Full Comment: i think you people are getting off on writing about rapes. lami fans are some sick f*cks.

I have seen this before... - Reviewer: seenbefore 07/01/07 11:56 AM EDT
Full Comment: I have seen this story line before with Luke and Laura on General Hospital 20 years ago. There was a third party on the show, her husband. After months of romance, Laura divorced her husband and married Luke. Here we are 20 years later with the same concerns about rape and romance. No rape is not romantic. I do not think Days fans have even implied such thing. It is a story line that Days is building on. Within a year, the story will be written to where "was it rape? or were they really in love?". Before you bash me for that statement, that is EXACTLY HOW GENERAL HOSPITAL turned it around. It went from rape to seduction. Personally, I watch the soaps to get away from real life. I am not looking for the answer to life's problems. When I want to do that I turn on Dr. Phil. For the record, I was raped twice in my life in my 20s. I do not take a soap opera to heart as the same as what happened in my life. Please do not speak out for me as a victim of rape. I like Days, James Scott and will continue watching.

Good but also Disappointed - Reviewer: MissyP 07/01/07 11:52 AM EDT
Full Comment: You had a good show Darcy, except for the rape on TV segment. That was irresponsible and too biased in regards to actualities of real rapes. But I loved your website and I like all the coverage you often do so I am still giving you good rating for that. I kind of feel ashamed for the actors though. What if the actors ever see this podcast and these comments from both sides? I am shaking my head at this. You people need to chill. There is no right or wrong here. However, I did hear that someone official from this podcast raided a chat at the EJami board last night and was very rude and nasty to those who hadn't even done anything. That was immature and wrong. Everyone is behaving as children. Yeah don't throw anything at me, but can't we all just get along? updated; Good show off to a good start until I heard your joke about wrestlers killing their families being entertaining. It was not funny in the least. So instead of 5 stars you get 1, and deserve even less.

Excellent show - Reviewer: MercScraps 07/01/07 11:23 AM EDT
Full Comment: Darcy you handled a delicate situation with great diplomacy. I was very impressed with the way that the discussion was handled. I look forward to this week's show with the opposing point of view. I'm sorry that some have chosen to bring down your ratings simply because they don't agree with the material presented.

this is very sad - Reviewer: EMicrosoftTec 07/01/07 09:46 AM EDT
Full Comment: I'm sorry, I can't condone this Darcy. I really want to give you a 4 or 5 and normally I would. You have great podcasts, but this time it fell short because of the biased and silly manner that rape was presented. When you talk about rape, people, please be realistic and remember the reality of this unfortunate and terrible crime. Do not make joke about it. You have let these fans drag rape and thereby (read: real) sexual abuse victims through the mud. I will tune in for the other side to get their chance which is only right after all this disservice to real sexual abuse victims that you have let occur. However, if anyone else - I don't care what sides or who, starts turning this into a joke again, I can not be responsible for what I say after that.

excellent show - Reviewer: magamu 07/01/07 09:17 AM EDT
Full Comment: Darcy I want to commend you on an excellent talk show. I think you handled the rape controversy in a very unbiased way. You deserve a rating of 5 without a doubt.

Great show Darcy! - Reviewer: RINR55 07/01/07 07:37 AM EDT
Full Comment: I was impressed by your handling of the whole RINR issue. You gave both sides a chance to air their views and made excellent points of your own rebutting those opposed to the campaign.

Good show! - Reviewer: ClayZebra 07/01/07 07:11 AM EDT
Full Comment: I enjoyed listening to your show earlier this week. I thought the sensitive issue of rape was presented very well. You run a nice show and are a good interviewer. I'm sorry that your reviews/ratings have suffered as a result of your discussing a topical, controversial subject in the soap opera world. But thank you all the same for having the dicussion.

You, sir, are a fiend. I got a bone to pick you young man. - Reviewer: AnnaNana 07/01/07 07:10 AM EDT
Full Comment: One of mey granddaughter showed me. How dares you allows this filth on your radio? And this is how you repay your loyal listeners? This speaks of the devil work encouraging these people to commit acts of murder upon people that have not even committed a crime?! Young man, you yourself same as encouraged the murders of non-rapists when you put them in the context of EJ and Sam Brady scenario (which was not actually rape). Is that what you are telling all these children now? So it is ok to kill innocent people now? What next, killing real rape victims and babies too? Huh, dont leave them out. What about if your wife or daughter ever rapes someone. You want them dead too? You want Sam character dead for her rape crime too? See this is what is wrong with the world today. No sensitivity to your fellow man and you people just donâ??t care who you hurt do you? Honey, that scenario was not rape. What filled you with that notion? Further, why have theseRomance is Not Rape campaign people started up this nonsense about rape when this is simply lies. Let me tell you I got your number son, I know all about you and your co-horts and this evil Ejamis vs. Lumis wars. Stop thinking about this silly little war for a minute and think about what you and your co-horts are doing to innocent rape victims when you put that silly little storyline that wasnâ??t ever even portrayed definitely as rape or not. When you put that up against real and true rape, in a realistic standpoint you are truly committing an injustice against your fellow mans. Is that funny to you? Is rape funny to Lumiâ??s? Because that is all that is being talked about and falsified and obsessed about. If this god awful offensive rape campaign does not stop making a mockery of real rape victimsÃ?¢Ã?Â?Ã?Â? suffering, then I am going to start up a campaign with real rape victims opposing this evil! If you want so badly to obsess about rape in your deviant minds, child look to Todd and Marty on OLTL, Sami and Austin on Days, Theresa and Ethan on Passions (well, before the rewrite), and Luke and Laura on GH. These were REAL rapes as far as daytime drama shows go these days. My church sponsors a rape crisis unit for young ladies and I have seen it all let me tell you sir right now. You canÃ?¢Ã?Â?Ã?Â?t imagine how damaging it is to punch people in the head with this slogan and campaigns about rape. You donÃ?¢Ã?Â?Ã?Â?t even know what rape is! You need to go back to church and get your devils prayed out of you. Same as laughing in the face of innocent victims and then encouraging murders of people (let alone innocent people who didnÃ?¢Ã?Â?Ã?Â?t even commit crimes). The Lord is watching you, young man. Please refrain from ever encouraging acts of evil on your radio show again! And for GodÃ?¢Ã?Â?Ã?Â?s sake get all your heads out of your crotches and stop thinking about new ways to make a mockery of rape. You think it is not hurting innocent people? I had a young lady come into our church crisis the other day (yes a real rape victim) and talked about how her show had gone off the deep end, what with this horrid writing and then these Lumi brand fans making a mockery of rape. She saw it in a magazine and online too. Maybe it is time to stop watching daytime drama when all you can think about is hurting others. Maybe it is time to stop watching daytime drama when all you can think about is making up ways in which to vilify poor fictitious characters for your own ends and in the process end up hurting suffering victims with the craziness you dream up. Maybe it should be an end to daytime soaps altogether, if it encourages this outrageous behavior. I will be praying for you, young man and all these people who are sinning against innocent rape victims and encouraging the slandering of your fellow man. I know one day you will see the light and then you will be very sorry. God will forgive you and so will I, but will you be able to forgive yourselves? I wish you all the best, I truly do. You my brother and I must love you and everyone else slandering these victims, but I hate your evil thoughts and ways. If you would like me to I can get you started on some scripture verses. Just let me know in that case. I can also try to find you a good church or church group in your area if you can beat back the devil to let you attends. Oh and please stopping making curse words in these comments. I don't care what your opinion. Have some respect for the Lord's ears.

Why are you upsetting all these females man? Take responsibility for YOUR actions - Reviewer: LLEL75 07/01/07 02:29 AM EDT
Full Comment: Man what are you doing here talking about all this rape? Can't you see you are being insensitive to all these females that have already went through that mess? My fiancee was raped by an unknown assailant. She watches those soaps, Days, Gen Hospital and One Life I think it is. She is upset over all this fake garbage these soap fans are doing with some fake campaign against some rape story on Days soap , when it wasn't even really rape at all. WHAT are YOU PEOPLE TRYING TO DO with this RAPE IS NOT ROMANTIC bullsh*t. Of course it's not romantic!!! It's brutal and ugly. Did that blonde chick look like she was beat up and bloodied? Did anyone hold a gun to her head? Did that dude threaten her life? I don't think so. You are sick perverts dwelling on this rape crap that was NOT RAPE. Man you need to be apologizing to all these females that were really raped - like my girl and these others in these comments here. Dude, stick to what you know and don't let these bored housewives stick their agenda onto you and your show. I think they are just crushing over tiny dude Lucas the mighty midget and are using your show to push their agendas. Making up all this fake rape crap is not funny and it's pitiful! Take responsibility. You said you would knock off anyone that raped your wife or daughter, well think what others feel like who have people who were really raped or molested. You dredging up all this crap, letting these people use your show as a tools to push Days Lucas lovers agendas are who are being damn hurtful fo real rape survivors. YOUR CAMPAIGN IS A DISGRACE! It makes me ill and I hope you and all your campaign pushers get a good dose of reality and a wake up call. Yeah this is the real world! If you want your days shows to be so full of reality then that blonde girl should have been beated or taken to a rape counselor or her fam kicking some man's ass that raped her. Did this happen, I don't think so. My girl says it didn't. Have you CAMPAIGN PUSHERS STOPPED TO THINK that you are hurting rape/molestation/sexual assault/incest victims, etc. Real ones and real rape that is! Not some sexual games or bargain like happened on that fake soap opera. You need to apologize to the REAL VICTIMS of rape that you are allowing to be hurt by these fake bullsh*t. You and Days' Lucas LUMIES fans are hurting survivors with your sick perverted campaign. I am offended for my girl and all dese females. Be a real man and stand up! If you were raped your own self or had your girls raped you would know what I'm sayin. Upsetting these victims is insane. Dude, this is messed up

Thanks for your time - Reviewer: aubergine_girl 07/01/07 02:05 AM EDT
Full Comment: I wanted to say thank you for the opportunity to voice our opinions on your show. I'm very sorry that the other side has unfairly drug you into our debate. I can't speak for all Lumi fans, but I would never resort to petty actions like that to try to discredit you and your show. I'm all for hearing the Ejami fans pov, so I will be listening in when they have their say.

Low ratings deserved this time - Reviewer: MMontgomery 07/01/07 12:32 AM EDT
Full Comment: ...due to inaccuracies and falsehoods presented in your podcast. There were two outright blatant lies told and encouraged. I expected more from this podcast. It has been better in the past, but you should not talk about such a controversial subject as rape when you do not even know all of your facts, particularly in the daytime Days' show storyline that you mentioned. Quite unprofessional of you and this is deserving of a 1 rating this time around and I stand by that choice. Shame on you for allowing this tripe that is offensive to actual rape victims.

Great Podcast - Reviewer: Sammirocks 07/01/07 12:14 AM EDT
Full Comment: I felt the podcast, as a whole, was very entertaining and well done. This was the first time I've heard it, and I intend on returning in the future, I hope. As far as the RINR campaign goes. Both sides are getting equal time. I think that is great! Both sides deserve their time. SuperSami and Marylina, ladies did a beautiful job talking respectfully about something they believe in!

Great! - Reviewer: hopeandlove 06/30/07 11:35 PM EDT
Full Comment: Great podcast! What a treat it was to have Bryan on the show! And to blow up the server... WOW! Wonderful questions, wonderful podcast and just so enjoyable to listen to. Keep up the great work, Darcy!

The rest of what...? - Reviewer: arcane_amorous 06/30/07 10:54 PM EDT
Full Comment: I thought that after the topic of the past/current storyline of DaysOfOurLives was over...it was a bit boring.

Great podcast! - Reviewer: CanuckDaysfan 06/30/07 10:28 PM EDT
Full Comment: The following is an excerpt from an email I sent Darcy after the show. Thanks for your awesome podcast last night. I was so sorry to miss it, but unfortunately real life had to take priority. I did listen to it though, and I loved the way you handled the subject. I especially loved how OLTL was brought up. I was a loyal viewer of OLTL from the early Tina/Cord days through the Marty gang rape storyline. I stopped watching around the time that the writers started toying with a Marty/Todd relationship. It was just too insulting, and I walked away from the show and have not been back since. I've heard the ejami argument that soap storylines do not need to be handled responsibly because "it's just fiction" but that doesn't hold water with me. Putting the rape storyline aside for a moment, what if we'd had the following scenario last year: A week after Hope finds out that Chelsea was behind the wheel of the vehicle that hit and killed Zack, she and Chelsea take off for a night on the town. We see them drinking and laughing, and then they head out, Chelsea at the wheel, and drive drunk through the streets of Salem, running several red lights. Imagine the outcy. Imagine how many people would be screaming that "Hope's behavior is completely out of character. No way would she be out celebrating with the girl she just found out killed her son, and she definitely wouldn't be driving around in a car with her. What an insult to parents who've lost children in real life." I guarantee that would be the reaction from the overwhelming majority of the "it's just fiction" criers. The only reason they're protesting this campaign, and denying the rape, is because it suits their James Scott/EJ agenda. But back to the subject of daytime's mishandling of sensitive issues, I can only say this: These writers call themselves professionals. As professionals, in my opinion, they are obligated to a duty of care in their writing. In other words, they should do no harm. Writing a story that has a rape survivor too ashamed to go to the police, too ashamed to tell her family, and seeminly unaware that things like the Morning After Pill are available, is completely irresponsible and dangerous. If the writers are unable to write a rape storyline, or a cancer storyline, or a hit and run storyline or any other socially relevant issue responsibly, then they need to completely stop writing those kind of stories, and instead stick to pure fantasy. Barring EJ's torturous death at the hands of Sami or her family, I'm sure that the Days writers will not resolve this fiasco to anyone's satisfaction, but I hope they at least pay attention and think twice before they send any other characters (Jeremy/Chelsea/Stephanie) down the same dark path. And I really hope that others soaps, GH in particular with Lulu and Logan, pay attention to the issues and concerns being brought forward, and rethink how they're handling these storylines. Thanks for lending us your forum.

EJAMI FANS - Reviewer: Darcy247 06/30/07 09:41 PM EDT
Full Comment: This is a ratings system for Total TV Online's talk show. It affects all past and future episodes. We had a 5 star rating for all our shows prior to you coming in here. You rated a one hour episode 1 to 2 stars based on a 15 minute segment that involved and opposing fan base voicing an opinion you do not like, nor agree with. This is not only selfish, and irresponsible, it does not do justice to your fanbase, and makes you look petty. I have offered equal time for you to voice your opinion and this is my reward? 1 and 2 stars and comments in here aimed at Lumi fans? Grow up. Those of you that have rated this episode 1 or 2 stars simply because Lumi fans were on, need to fix the damage you have unfairly done to my show overall. Please REVOTE and this time, be fair and responsible. Lumi fans, pay heed to this warning just in case you too decide to ruin the rating and reputation of my show by casting a low vote in the next episode when Ejami gets their say. Also to both sides, keep your ratings and comments ABOUT THE SHOW, the WHOLE SHOW, and do not use this ratings system to wage your fanbase war with one another. Very pissed off Darcy.

Protest over nothing - Reviewer: Angie27 06/30/07 08:30 PM EDT
Full Comment: I appreciate you bringing this very important subject to the viewers attention. I agree wholeheartedly with the message that rape is not romance. However, I'm confused as to why there is such an outrcy about this since the particular storyline is not being portrayed as romance. At present there has been no indication from the show that Sami has any kind of romantic feelings for E.J. In fact, just the opposite has happened, she has repeatedly stated that she hates him and wants him out of his life and she has only turned to him for help when her life was in danger. There are also no spoilers indicating that the show is planning on forming any kind of a romantic relationship between Sami and E.J. At the point we merely have people speculating that they think it might happen. So it seems a bit premature for there to be such an outcry over storylines that could possibly happen in the future. The writers could potentially come up with any number of storylines that might be unpleasant to some viewers, but until we actually have some indication that the show might go in that direction it seems a bit odd to be protesting now. Perhaps the viewers who are protesting could put their time to a better use than protesting storylines that haven't even happened yet, and instead apply this effort to protesting the current irresponsible storylines. For instance: there is currently a storyline going where a woman is married to a man who is emotionally abusing her, a man who has tried to kill her twice in the past. There is also a storyline going where a man had sex with a woman who was drugged at the time. If the RINR campaigners would like to protest the current irresponsible storylines that I would be only too happy to join then in protesting. But I cannot in good conscience waste my time on protesting something that could potentially happen in the future.

Why are some things so forgivable, while other things are not! - Reviewer: jordan4 06/30/07 04:49 PM EDT
Full Comment: I am so glad that next week you are giving the other side a chance to defend our couple. I am a rape survivor, actually I was violated in the same way that Sami violated Austin. I forgave Sami and I can forgive EJ too. I also have a strong issue on why some things are so forgivable and others are not. For example when did attempted murder become so forgivable but yet some are ready to hang EJ out to dry? I believe every actor can be subjected to bad writing and every actor should have the opportunity to redeem his or her character. I believe James Scott is well on his way to redeem EJ. I agree he does have a long way to go. If Jack can be redeemed or anyone else, EJ should also.

Thank You & Question for discussion on future show - Reviewer: ANonyMouse 06/30/07 03:35 PM EDT
Full Comment: Thank you for discussing such an interesting topic responsibly. Daytime is fictional, but television shows have a responsibility to the audience to portray the topics they write about realistically. Sweeping a crime like rape under the rug because fans find the actor James Scott attractive is irresponsible. I look forward to your next show and I hope to everyone who supports a romance between a rapist and his victim answer 2 questions... 1. If Lucas had not been part of the equation, if Sami had just been stranded on the side of the road by herself when EJ picked her up, do you really think he wouldn't have still forced her to have sex with him? Remember he was on his way out of town and his whole agenda before coming to town was to impregnate a Brady woman. This was his last chance. 2. How can people claim James Scott's looks have no bearing in this situation? Had Stefano or Tony Dimera or another less attractive and charming actor performed this act, no one would be questioning the act as rape. I hear the opposition is 'gearing' up to rebut the discussion next week. Along with those two questions I wonder if they can defend their position without going into the whole 'This person did this...' or 'So-and-so did that...' defense. No other character's actions defend or excuse what EJ did.*********** I'm adding on and I don't know if you'll re-read this. But I did listen to your whole show. This is the first time. I only watch Days so that's what I was most interested in, but I liked the gossip too. You guys did mention something that made me think of a question I would love for you guys to discuss... Do You think the abundance of spoilers, the internet and/or day ahead airings of the shows have contributed to the downfall of ratings for the soaps?

put it in perspective... - Reviewer: Evey 06/30/07 03:21 PM EDT
Full Comment: Are you kidding me!? I just listened to the Bryan interview, and Bryan in no way said that Lumi is taking a "temporary" break, and that they are getting back together, that was all you. Seriously, you're the one that's keeping this "war" alive by comments like that saying that Ejami fans are going to get their heart broken. How immature, that is the most biased interview I've ever heard. I may not like Lumi, but I have nothing against Bryan. If everyone is so worried about the influence Soap Opera's have on young impressionable girls, why not also start a campaign about Jeremy and Stephanie? Jeremy treats her like garbage, cheated on her, and speaks to her in a degrading manner, yet she's still with him. What kind of message is that to send to the young women out there? Stepahnie says she loves him, isn't that portraying inacurate representation of love? How irresponsible of these writers, now every single young girl out there is going to think that this is love and that this kind of relationship is acceptable. (-_-) And I'd say that this storyline is directly targeting the younger teenage viewers for the summer. Making it more of an issue for younger girls. Put it in perspective people, if there is an outcry about one, then there can't be a pick and choose aspect to this "campaign to bring moral responsiblity to Soaps." So if anyone wants to start a campaign to say that Stephanie and Jeremy's relationship is irresponsible...I'm in.

Need a balanced debate - Reviewer: poisonivy 06/30/07 02:37 PM EDT
Full Comment: Hearing only one side of the debate doesn't really give a fair representation of this issues with this storyline, and I truly believe this is more about this particular storyline and pairing than it is about the representation of rape in soaps. Suspension of disbelief is essential in watching soaps and the indignation with rape, when murder, blackmail, robbery and various other crimes are never dealt with realistically is simply selective morality. DAYS and soaps in general, have always been more about exaggerating and parodying RL than being a reflection of it. Storyline possibilities are the most important because you need interesting story, that dramatic conflict to keep viewers tuning in, and EJami provides that in spades. Finally, if people can forgive and actually root for a dysfunctional pairing where the principals spent the better part of 14 years hating each other and being verbally and physically abusive, then I don't see the issue with fans rooting for Ejami.

not really fair to ejamis this time, so glad you are giving them time next week - Reviewer: IMissAremid 06/30/07 02:06 PM EDT
Full Comment: I don't think it's accurate to say the only reason EJami fans want EJ and Sami together is the chemistry and the fact that James Scott is hot. Many of us, whether we believe what happened in that car was rape or not (and I have gone back and forth over that issue), simply see so many richer storylines developing from an EJ and Sami pairing that we want the two of them to get together. I contend that while a romance blooming from rape is unconventional, it is ABSOLUTELY within the realm of possibility for this particular character of Sami Brady to forgive and fall in love with EJ even if she felt what he did to her was rape considering she herself has raped a man she claimed to love and tried to use the pregnancy following that act to establish a loving relationship with her victim AND because she has already demonstrated in her marriage to Lucas a huge capacity for forgiveness when it comes to her romantic relationships considering Lucas tried to KILL HER and framed her for a murder he committed sending her to death row. I also want to see EJ change and watch his struggle to become a better man, even if it isn't always successful, and I think the only way that would happen is in a romantic relationship with Sami. I really don't think the MESSAGE sent by Sami struggling with her feelings for and eventually falling in love with EJ, a man she claims raped her, is any worse than the MESSAGE being sent by this show when it comes to her relationship with an equally dysfunctional man who has tried to kill her being presented as her knight in shining armor.

In Re: ANonyMouse's questions - Reviewer: Alyssa1023 06/30/07 12:14 AM EDT
Full Comment: 1. If Lucas had not been part of the equation, if Sami had just been stranded on the side of the road by herself when EJ picked her up, do you really think he wouldn't have still forced her to have sex with him? Remember he was on his way out of town and his whole agenda before coming to town was to impregnate a Brady woman. This was his last chance. Let's put Marlena in Lucas place. She is someone Sami loves dearly. The fact is that the person who was trapped has no relevance when debating whether the negotiations between Sami and EJ would be considered rape or not. They both had something to gain from each other. But I do believe that if I was to stick by the history of characters, and it was Kate under that beam I would be surprised if Sami made the same decision and would have tried to find help elsewhere. Since EJ did not buy Sami's story regarding the boathouse, this is apparent since he went to the boathouse prepared, I do believe that if he really was a rapist he would have taken Sami forcibly in her apartment when they were alone together. It seems to me that EJ's main concern that night was getting through the roadblock and getting out of town.2. How can people claim James Scott's looks have no bearing in this situation? Had Stefano or Tony Dimera or another less attractive and charming actor performed this act, no one would be questioning the act as rape. First I have to say that I find Joe and Thaao to be extremely attractive men as well. I can only speak for myself when I say that it really doesn't matter who Sami negotiated with to get help for Lucas what she did was her choice. Some people my find that hard to believe because they can't see anyone letting their loved one's die and don't see that as a choice. But there are plenty of people out there who have sick loved ones who can't afford the medical procedures that they need to save them because they don't have the finances. Should we excuse these people for robbing a bank just because it would save a life? I think people are confusing morals with the law. I hear the opposition is 'gearing' up to rebut the discussion next week. Along with those two questions I wonder if they can defend their position without going into the whole 'This person did this...' or 'So-and-so did that...' defense. No other character's actions defend or excuse what EJ did. I think what you are talking about here is the fact that some people bring up the cut and dry rape of Austin when ever this rape debate comes up. You are right that Sami's past actions do not factor in the discussions at hand. Her actions are relevant however in regards to the outcry of rape not being romance. Where was the outcry then? And why is she so easily forgiven and rooted for if a rapist on a show is seen as evil and unworthy of redemption? For the record please know that I do not believe that someone's looks, power or money, are enough to excuse someone of rape. But I do not agree that a woman who gives herself to someone expecting something in return is rape either. I agree with the fact that if we are going to discuss the components that are required for something to legally viewed as rape we really should not be talking about past actions of characters on the show. The outrage should be about the writers not doing their research and poorly writing a scene that if it was supposed to depict a rape did not.

great idea, but need more questions from audience - Reviewer: laurensnana 06/29/07 10:55 PM EDT
Full Comment: darcy, i do thank you for being kind enough to allow rebuttal from the other side..and make no mistake, this is really a fan base war rather than a concern over a social issue. and to make my point, as you said you are a lumi..ok fine..you also said if someone did this to your wife or daughter you would handle it yourself (may be a paraphrase,, but seemed to indicate you would kill the perp) ok..now reverse the situation a bit, what if your wife or daughter at some time in their life used a rophy drug on a male and seduced them, this is rape also ..(which sami did at one time) ..do you think the parents of that young man would be justified in killing your wife or daughter? and apparently, this is not an unheard of occurence per a policewoman who is one of forbidden loves members.. point of above is i do not think anyone would be justified in killing your wife or daughter, or for anyone killing sami for that matter..and would your wife or daughter be beyond redemption as you said ej was? do you think sami was beyond or is beyond redemtpion? did anyone start rape campaigns to keep sami from marrying austin? this is a cynical way to use a social issue to try and influence the creative process of a soap opera..god! what next? well next is one of the lumi fans starting a campaign about how the writer does not know the true biology of how twins are conceived..are we getting desperate here? murder, drugs, abortion, blackmail, incest, and probably the seven deadly sins are shown on soaps, to expect them to follow the p.c line on all of that is a little silly and i hope the powers that be just all take a breath and keep on trucking! i just read your comment and sorry, but i was rating it on the quality of the argument given for what i listened to..i did not listen to the whole cast..and since the ejami side was represented very lightly and we only knew about it very late my rating had to do with what i heard. so i am sorry if that was inappropriate, but that is my reason. and i have tried to rerate it on the basis of not knowing what went on in the rest of the podcast after listening, but i am not able to. since you have come in to our chat on the ejami site and rescinded your equal time offer, i offer this, i really felt you were an unprofessional biased host, but i was originally trying to be nice.

EJami IS Romance - Reviewer: powermouse 06/29/07 01:34 AM EDT
Full Comment: Ok Darcy, I have increased my rating of your podcast to 3. This is a fair representation of what I judge your entire show. I admit that my initial rating was only for the segment promoting a fanbase agenda that I don't agree with. I can't speak for anyone else but I would like to clarify that I did not rate the show based on what the Lumi fans had to say at all but only on what you yourself said and you did insult my POV several times and you used the opportunity to, in my opinion, unfairly insult an actor I have a great deal of respect for. To get a high rating from me, I would expect a show like this to be neutral and I didn't feel that it was. The rest of the show was ok but didn't knock my socks off. You have only just begun doing this and so I'm sure you will improve with each show you put out here. You may have had a perfect score but if you choose to discuss controversial issues, chances are, your score is going to take a hit. This isn't about fan bases but about the issue you chose to discuss and a campaign that many people, including rape victims, find incredibly offensive. Perhaps you could consider it a different way - if you had spent a portion of a show talking about abortion and only talked about "pro-life", for example, and made your views on it clear, would you be surprised if "pro-choice" activists expressed their opinion of the show through a low rating? I'm just trying to help put it in perspective. This isn't a slam of you as a person just of the way in which you chose to present a particular topic. I am truly sorry that some people from our fan base have given you such a low rating and have not adjusted it after learning how the rating system works. I only heard about your concerns today otherwise I would have come back here sooner and adjusted my rating.

Great discussion - Reviewer: joyfuljessica 06/27/07 10:45 PM EDT
Full Comment: I am looking forward to the continuation of this discussion of rape is not romance next week. I'm very interested in how/why Ejami fans can support the pairing of a victim and her rapist. The explanation I seem to see on the boards most often is something like, "EJ is the Hottest, they have such chemistry!" I appreciated Darcy bringing up the fact that chemistry doesn't justify anything.

On the show and only the show - Reviewer: karibelle1 06/27/07 07:30 PM EDT
Full Comment: Darcy, I give you 5 stars because you are a fair and eloquent individual who showed courage by taking on a controversial subject and by giving equal time to both sides of the arguement. Thanks, Karibelle

Great job! - Reviewer: Lumify 06/27/07 02:23 PM EDT
Full Comment: I loved Bryan's interview and thought it was very entertaining. You and Bryan were very funny together, I'll be looking forward to you as a writer on Days' for a week, lol!

Rape Is Not Romance - Reviewer: aimees76 06/27/07 11:20 AM EDT
Full Comment: Thank you for discussing this topic, it was wonderful to hear SuperSami and marylina. This campaign is important because rape in the media is all to common, and too rarely handled appropriately. The powers that be need to understand that their audience has intelligence and emotion, in regard to the stories they tell, and that should be respected.

no worries - Reviewer: myalika 06/27/07 10:00 AM EDT
Full Comment: Darcy I feel you handled a difficult subject excellently...It amazes me that anyone could be angry at you for bringing to light such a delicate thing. You presented the facts and I thank you for that. As a survivor of not 1 but 2 attempted rapes, I feel your show was a much needed realization of how mishandled this storyline has become. People will want what they want, and I can accept the facts. But the fact is by protraying Sami (a previous rape victim herself) as someone who could and would trust her rapist, it is telling woman and girls that it is in fact A FORM OF LOVE???....."because EJ really loves Sami"-the usual argument. But as Sami herself said a couple of days ago "A man does not rape the woman he loves" And I for one can tell you for sure rape or not rape, the situation EJ put Sami in was most certainly NOT an act of love in any way shape or form. Keep up the good work Darcy, I will continue to listen Kim

Rape is not romance - Reviewer: fatedlove 06/27/07 12:32 AM EDT
Full Comment: Great podcast. I was pleased for informing us with the Rape is Not Romance campaign. I expect to take full part in this campaign. Darcy, you did a great job expressing your view on this rape topic and I couldn't agree more with you.

Awesome show, Darcy! - Reviewer: princess_eternity 06/27/07 12:16 AM EDT
Full Comment: I really enjoyed the show this week and love your BS detector! Looking forward to next week's show as always.

Thank You - Reviewer: violetroses 06/26/07 11:50 PM EDT
Full Comment: As an avid supporter of the "Rape is Not Romance" campaign..I just wanted to say thank you for allowing us to voice our opinions about this topic. I will be listening next week in hopes that we can continue this discussion.

Rape is Not Romance - Reviewer: mrenek 06/26/07 11:28 PM EDT
Full Comment: Thank you very much for the podcast. It was so great of you to take the time to allow us to voice our concerns about sending the wrong message to viewers. This issue obviously has created some much needed attention, and for you to take the time and effort to help with this issue is very much appreciated. I agree with all the statements made by SuperSami, marylina, and Darcy. I loved the entire discussion. I look forward to many more podcasts in the future.

Great show - Reviewer: timepass 06/26/07 10:08 PM EDT
Full Comment: Not enough Y&R and GH, but what can I say, I'm biaise like that. But I learned about other show!

Thank you so much - Reviewer: marylina 06/26/07 10:06 PM EDT
Full Comment: It was the best podcast by far as our campaign was mentioned. Thank you for letting us voice it. You rock. Comments for Celebrity Call In for September 11, 2007 Darcy, what can I say. Tonight's show with Bryan was the best show ever. Thank you for interviewing him and hope you can get him to come back again. Love it.

Wonderful broadcast!!!! - Reviewer: SuperSami 06/26/07 10:02 PM EDT
Full Comment: Regarding the Bryan Dattilo guest spot--loved the show!!! It was so cool that Bry stopped by and I thought the discussion was excellent! Great interview! Regarding the 7/3 show--wonderful. Very balanced and fair and it was magnanimous of you to follow through. You rock and so does your staff. Keep up the good word. I thought the discussion on discrimination on ABC was thought provoking! Just responding to Ms. Bennett--whomever told you that was wrong. I did not start that, although I have used it in connection with a certain few people who have made comments such is, if that was rape, we all should be raped everyday. Please get your facts straight before you make accusations. It was a very well thought out and professional show and I enjoyed it a lot. I look forward to the next one!!!

Great job -- - Reviewer: LindaT 06/20/07 06:52 PM EDT
Full Comment: It was enjoyable to hear your voices. I have stopped taping and watching GH so it was enjoyable hearing about it.

Great Job - Reviewer: lambypie25 06/19/07 10:15 PM EDT
Full Comment: It was wonderful to hear all the up and coming info, and hear about my soaps!! Great scoops and great gossip! Good job done by ALL! Thanks so much Darcy!

Great job - Reviewer: GiveMeZach 06/16/07 09:56 PM EDT
Full Comment: For the first time in 3 years, I not only didn't go to the Emmys, I didn't even watch them last night. Can't get the software to work on my PC for some reason, but I enjoyed listening anyway. Very entertaining.

Loved it! - Reviewer: plaroia 06/16/07 08:40 PM EDT
Full Comment: I don't watch most of the shows, so I loved getting the scoop on all the nominations. Can't wait for the next broadcast!

Finally some one said it right - Reviewer: ldybugholden 06/16/07 08:06 PM EDT
Full Comment: LOVED IT TONIGHT !!!!!! Good song with the kill bill opener ....great job!!!!!!! So nice to hear it the way it really is...... no bs !!!!!

Great Soap Concept - Reviewer: osuosu87 06/15/07 06:20 PM EDT
Full Comment: What a nice surprise. Great content. Love it.

Emmy Pre-Show - Reviewer: BOnNORA4Ever 06/15/07 05:08 PM EDT
Full Comment: I loved hearing others opinions on who should or would win in the major categories. It was interesting listening to others input with the different categories, since I only watch ABC soaps.

Emmy Pre-Show - Reviewer: kiyote72 06/15/07 10:18 AM EDT
Full Comment: Great Job...nice to hear someone speak the truth about the Emmy process. Supporting Actress....RH should win! Thanks TotalTV online

Excellent - Reviewer: frances11 06/15/07 07:18 AM EDT
Full Comment: Good insight & opinions. The flow of the participants & there reasons for who they thought would win/should win was excellent

Some Ejami Fans are pathetic - Reviewer: Darcy Fournier 06/14/07 10:06 PM EDT
Full Comment: If James Scott were on the show, I would have joked with him as I did with Bryan. Bryan was cool with it and it was BRYAN'S interview... Ejami fans that have voted on my show continue to show what a bunch of horses asses some of them are. Anytime anyone says anything negative about "their boy" their panties get in a bunch and they whine like little b*tches. LUMI fans filled the room and BRYAN'S popularity shut down our server. Bryan did not say too many things that would make them happy, but they acted with class. You don't see them coming on here acting like idiots...probably because they do not have to constantly defend Bryan or his character, when there is no justification for it, in portraying a rapist. Get a life and grow up- if that is not too hard for you. If I were James Scott, I would kill myself just from the embarrasment in having people like you in my fanbase.

Great Show! - Reviewer: caroleamc 06/14/07 09:40 PM EDT
Full Comment: Fast moving, interesting, and informative.