Tactical [Sovereignty] Community Call
Description: more
Hosted by: Bryanp21
Phone Number: (724) 444-7444
Call ID: 143321
Share This Via:

Next Episode
Title: EPISODE 81 -What Crypto Currency is/Tactical [Sovereignty] Community Call

Episode Starts In:
Last Recording
Title: EPISODE 80 - Occupy Your State of...Tactical [Sovereignty]

Who Follows
  Sign In to follow

Add To Your Blog
Widgets & Badges

Email a Friend

  Sign In to review

Scheduled Episodes

Time: Duration: Title:
07/22/2018 07:00 PM EDT
120 min
EPISODE 81 -What Crypto Currency is/Tactical [Sovereignty] Community Call

Past Episodes (88)

Time: Duration: Title: Recordings:
12/31/2017 07:00 PM EST
EPISODE 51-Kurt Kallenbach Tactical [Sovereignty]
12/24/2017 07:00 PM EST
EPISODE50 Obvious RemedyTactical [Sovereignty]
12/17/2017 07:00 PM EST
EPISODE 49 Status/Agency Tactical [Sovereignty]
12/10/2017 06:20 PM EST
EPISODE 48 - Tactical [Sovereignty] Community Call
12/03/2017 07:00 PM EST
EPISODE 47 - Are you an Agent? Tactical [Sovereignty] Community Call
11/26/2017 07:00 PM EST
EPISODE 46 - Case Dismissed Tactical [Sovereignty]
11/19/2017 07:00 PM EST
EPISODE 45- Who is really Who. [Jew?]
11/12/2017 07:00 PM EST
EPISODE 44 - Voting etc. Tactical [Sovereignty]
11/05/2017 07:00 PM EST
EPISODE 43 - Real Talk, Where's the Claim?
10/29/2017 07:00 PM EDT
EPISODE 42 Greg S /Silenced/Genocide/Gangstalking
10/22/2017 07:00 PM EDT
EPISODE 41 - Tactical [Sovereignty] Community Call
10/19/2017 12:30 AM EDT
EPISODE 40 - Child claim Tactical [Sovereignty]
10/15/2017 06:48 PM EDT
EPISODE39 -Mind control w/ John Captain
10/08/2017 07:00 PM EDT
EPISODE 38- STEPS: Pro's/Con's [Sovereignty] Community Call
10/01/2017 07:00 PM EDT
EPISODE37 - The Assassination of Tiffany Jenks


January 21, 2018 call... Time Stamp 01:32:25 - Reviewer: jacqueceltic 01/29/18 04:19 AM EST
Full Comment: At Time-Stamp 01:32:25 Clint Richardson MISTAKENLY states that the Bible says TO NOT RESPECT PERSONS as in the legal sense by which many folk who have been studying law are familiar with the concept that a PERSON in the legal sense refers to fictional legal CORPORATIONS and other fictional legal ENTITIES (that otherwise are referred to as false IDOLS in the biblical sense) which are recognizable by the law. However, whenever the phrase -God is no respecter of persons- is written within the bible the word -person- ONLY refers to real living people (men, women, and children) and not to a legal fictional PERSON. Nowhere in the bible does it say to not respect PERSONS in the legal sense. All references in the bible to the phrase that -God is no respecter of persons- actually means... NOT to discriminate against any -person- (as in real living men, women, and children in the biblical sense) and that all -persons- (as in real living men, women, and children) are to be treated equally and equitably without any prejudice whatsoever. The MISTAKEN concept that God does NOT respect -PERSONS-, as in the legal sense, is completely INCORRECT and WRONG and has been circulating throughout the internet like a wildfire as disinformation and misinformation. Those spreading such falsities need to repent ("repent" means to renew one's thought or understanding) and to reread and correctly interpret and understand each of the biblical passages and verses in their full context in order to arrive at the very truth that the phrase -God is no respecter of persons- truly means that God does NOT discriminate against any living -person- (as real living men, women, and children), and furthermore it means that God treats all living -persons- equally without any prejudice whatsoever. Abundant divine blessings in love and peace to all.

This is a Very Informative Show, - Reviewer: Lordvenom25704 08/31/17 01:53 AM EDT
Full Comment: Bryan and his guess are very helpful and from what i call tell Good peoples,God Bless them and all of you,

So Sorry I didn't find this call sooner - Reviewer: Deerinheadlights 08/24/17 05:23 AM EDT
Full Comment: Just listened to the recorded podcast and realized I have been missing a great call. I would have loved to have been there to comment on Rev 12 which he asked for comment on. It's something I have been studying for long time now and have some inklings of possibilities regarding this text. Am looking forward to his next call. Good work going on here. See you soon. K